Re: [PATCH v2 nf-next 5/5] netfilter: nft: rt nexthop for inet family

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Anders,

2016-10-21 16:26 GMT+08:00 Anders K. Pedersen | Cohaesio <akp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
[...]
> I had a look at it. This construct is used for NFT_CT_SRC and
> NFT_CT_DST, where the init function just returns the IPv6 length for
> the inet family. But I'm not sure how this can work for userspace, and
> at least for current nftables there are problems:
>
> # nft flush ruleset
> # nft add table inet filter
> # nft add chain inet filter input
> # nft add rule inet filter input ether type ip flow table acct \{ ct original saddr timeout 600s counter \}
> # nft list ruleset
> Killed
> # nft list flow tables
> Killed

I guess there's a bug in nft utility, same problem exists in ip/ip6 family.

In init routine, nft_validate_register_store was used to ensure
that we will not do overflow operation.

>
> The latter two commands are killed by the OOM killer after a few
> seconds. Same thing happens for 'ether type ip6', while it works fine
> with 'ip saddr' or 'rt ip nexthop' in stead of 'ct original saddr'.
>
> Regards,
> Anders
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux