On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 02:53:53PM +0800, fgao@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Gao Feng <fgao@xxxxxxxxxx> > > It is valid that the TCP RST packet which does not set ack flag, and bytes > of ack number are zero. But current seqadj codes would adjust the "0" ack > to invalid ack number. Actually seqadj need to check the ack flag before > adjust it for these RST packets. Applied, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
