Brandon Cazander <brandon.cazander@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [ cc netfilter-devel ] > Sorry to resurrect this so much later—I just got back from holidays and this was still on my desk. > > Will anyone have another chance to look at this? It appears that the DIVERT rule is not working in our case, and I wonder if it is possible to fix the TPROXY target as well as the socket target fix that Florian provided. Are there reproducer instructions available for this? I don't see how TPROXY can be 'fixed' because when skb (tcp syn) is in mangle PREROUTING nat transformation(s) have not been set up (yet). So ip header addresses are all we have. Only the ack (that finishes 3whs) or retransmitted syns will have the post-nat address info available. Ack should work fine with (changed) -m socket since the socket should already be in the main ehash table. Syn should also work just fine because Erics changes should not affect initial listener lookup done by TPROXY. > It appears as though nobody else has encountered this regression, so I can appreciate that it comes up pretty low on the priority list. If it is not realistic that this will be looked at further, then we will have to look at replacing TPROXY. If you already need NAT anyway you can also use -j REDIRECT (or exclude tproxied packets from nat). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
