Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: log: Check param to avoid overflow in nf_log_set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:30 PM,  <fgao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Gao Feng <fgao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The nf_log_set is an interface function, so it should do the strict sanity
> check of parameters. Add  one sanity check for pf, it could not exceed
> NFPROTO_NUMPROTO, and print error log when pf is invalid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <fgao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/nf_log.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_log.c b/net/netfilter/nf_log.c
> index aa5847a..02ce0b9 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_log.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_log.c
> @@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ void nf_log_set(struct net *net, u_int8_t pf, const struct nf_logger *logger)
>  {
>         const struct nf_logger *log;
>
> -       if (pf == NFPROTO_UNSPEC)
> +       if (pf == NFPROTO_UNSPEC || pf >= NFPROTO_NUMPROTO) {
> +               pr_err("Wrong pf(%d) for nf log", pf);
>                 return;
> +       }
>
>         mutex_lock(&nf_log_mutex);
>         log = nft_log_dereference(net->nf.nf_loggers[pf]);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>

BTW, another similar interface function "nf_log_register" checks
sanity of param "pf".
So I think nf_log_set also need to check if param "pf" exceeds the valid range.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux