Re: [libnftnl PATCH 5/7] common: Avoid integer overflow in nftnl_batch_is_supported()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 01:33:37AM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> time() may return -1 which is then assigned to an unsigned integer type
> and used as sequence number. The following code increments that number
> multiple times, so it may overflow and get libmnl confused. To avoid
> this, fall back to a starting sequence number of zero in case the call
> to time() failed.

(uint32_t)-1 should be fine for netlink as sequence number.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux