From: Liping Zhang <liping.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Currently, user can add a conntrack with different l4proto via nfnetlink. For example, original tuple is TCP while reply tuple is SCTP. This is invalid combination, we should report EINVAL to userspace. Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <liping.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c index b9bfe64..fdfc71f 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c @@ -1894,6 +1894,8 @@ static int ctnetlink_new_conntrack(struct net *net, struct sock *ctnl, if (!cda[CTA_TUPLE_ORIG] || !cda[CTA_TUPLE_REPLY]) return -EINVAL; + if (otuple.dst.protonum != rtuple.dst.protonum) + return -EINVAL; ct = ctnetlink_create_conntrack(net, &zone, cda, &otuple, &rtuple, u3); -- 2.5.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
