Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_redirect.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_redirect.c > > index 20396499..2e7c4f9 100644 > > --- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_redirect.c > > +++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_redirect.c > > @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ ebt_redirect_tg(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par) > > return EBT_DROP; > > > > if (par->hooknum != NF_BR_BROUTING) > > - /* rcu_read_lock()ed by nf_hook_slow */ > > + /* rcu_read_lock()ed by nf_hook_thresh */ > > Why are all these comments being renamed in this patch? This patch > description doesn't say anything about this. Aaron, I'm sorry about this. I suggest to do this renaming in a different patch, i.e. keep the rcu_read_lock in nf_hook_slow in this patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
