Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libxt_hashlimit: Prepare libxt_hashlimit.c for revision 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/08/2016 12:54 PM, Vishwanath Pai wrote:
> On 07/08/2016 12:37 PM, David Laight wrote:
>> If you think some users would still want 32bit limits, then you should
>> (probably) use a _64 suffix for the new functions.
>>
>> 	David
> 
> I am proposing a new revision for hashlimit that supports a higher rate
> along with a few other changes/fixes (in separate patches). Hence the
> prefix _v2 for the new functions.
> 
> - Vish
> 

I'm sorry _v1 for the old functions, the new functions (for rev2) don't
have a suffix.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux