Hi pablo,
At 2016-06-14 02:19:02, "Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 12:20:27PM +0800, Liping Zhang wrote:
>
>Thanks for tracking down and fixing this one.
>
>I've made a new version based on your original patch, find it
>attached.
>
>Basically, the idea is to pass the genmask through iter, so we can
>perform the conditional check based on whether 1) we're dumping or
>2) checking for loops (ie. in the middle of a transaction).
>
>Let me know if you see any problem with this different approach,
>thanks.
I think your patch is better than mine. I also test it, it works well.
Tested-by: Liping Zhang <liping.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks?韬{.n?壏煯壄?%娝?檩?w?{.n?壏租栕庄z_鉃豝n噐■?侂h櫒璀?｛鄗夸z罐楘+€?zf＂穐殘啳嗃i?飦?戧鐉_璁鎗:+v墾?撸鴐
