Re: [PATCH] iptables: extensions: libxt_MARK: Add translation to nft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4 June 2016 at 14:42,  <rodanber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Roberto García <rodanber@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add translation for the MARK target to nftables.
>
> Examples:
>
> $ sudo iptables-translate -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -j MARK
> --set-mark 64
> nft add rule ip mangle OUTPUT tcp dport 22 counter meta mark set 0x40
>
> $ sudo iptables-translate -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -j MARK
> --set-xmark 64
> nft add rule ip mangle OUTPUT tcp dport 22 counter meta mark set 0x40
>
> $ sudo iptables-translate -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -j MARK
> --or-mark 64
> nft add rule ip mangle OUTPUT tcp dport 22 counter meta mark set mark or 0x40
>
> $ sudo iptables-translate -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -j MARK --and-mark
> 64
> nft add rule ip mangle OUTPUT tcp dport 22 counter meta mark set mark and 0x40
>
> $ sudo iptables-translate -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -j MARK
> --xor-mark 64
>
> nft add rule ip mangle OUTPUT tcp dport 22 counter meta mark set mark xor 0x40
>

I miss some examples on working with masks. I would like to see how do
you translate for example '--set-xmark value/mask' and '--set-mark
value/mask'.

Perhaps you could delete the '-p tcp --dport 22' thing, so we are
short and to the point with the examples.

> Signed-off-by: Roberto García <rodanber@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  extensions/libxt_MARK.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/extensions/libxt_MARK.c b/extensions/libxt_MARK.c
> index 556dbde..9383f64 100644
> --- a/extensions/libxt_MARK.c
> +++ b/extensions/libxt_MARK.c
> @@ -245,6 +245,26 @@ static void mark_tg_save(const void *ip, const struct xt_entry_target *target)
>         printf(" --set-xmark 0x%x/0x%x", info->mark, info->mask);
>  }
>
> +static int mark_tg_xlate(const void *ip, const struct xt_entry_target *target,
> +                        struct xt_xlate *xl, int numeric)
> +{
> +       const struct xt_mark_tginfo2 *info = (const void *)target->data;
> +
> +       if (info->mark == 0)
> +               xt_xlate_add(xl, "meta mark set mark and 0x%x",
> +                            (unsigned int)(uint32_t)~info->mask);

This double casting seems very weird to me. I would try to have only
one casting at most. Did you try it? Probably no cast is even
required, actually (I don't know)

> +       else if (info->mark == info->mask)
> +               xt_xlate_add(xl, "meta mark set mark or 0x%x", info->mark);
> +       else if (info->mask == 0)
> +               xt_xlate_add(xl, "meta mark set mark xor 0x%x", info->mark);
> +       else if (info->mask == 0xffffffffU)
> +               xt_xlate_add(xl, "meta mark set 0x%x", info->mark);
> +       else
> +               xt_xlate_add(xl, "meta mark xset 0x%x/0x%x", info->mark, info->mask);

'meta mark xset' ? Probably you can print 'meta mark set'
unconditionally so you avoid this kind of errors.

> +
> +       return 1;
> +}

-- 
Arturo Borrero González
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux