Re: [PATCH] nf_nat_packet: Clear skb hash after modifying packet headers.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:31:10PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Clear the skb hash when it does not reflect the actual header values
> any more.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jarno@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
> index 06a9f45..3c2302f 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
> @@ -505,6 +505,7 @@ unsigned int nf_nat_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
>  		if (!l3proto->manip_pkt(skb, 0, l4proto, &target, mtype))
>  			return NF_DROP;
>  	}
> +	skb_clear_hash(skb);
>  	return NF_ACCEPT;
>  }

Cc'ing Florian.

This seems to affect the new tracing infrastructure for nf_tables:

 31 static int trace_fill_id(struct sk_buff *nlskb, struct sk_buff
*skb)
 32 {
 33         __be32 id;
 34 
 35         /* using skb address as ID results in a limited number of
 36          * values (and quick reuse).
 37          *
 38          * So we attempt to use as many skb members that will not
 39          * change while skb is with netfilter.
 40          */
 41         id = (__be32)jhash_2words(hash32_ptr(skb), skb_get_hash(skb),
 42                                   skb->skb_iif);
 43 
 44         return nla_put_be32(nlskb, NFTA_TRACE_ID, id);
 45 }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux