On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:20:19PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Tuesday 2016-04-26 21:27, Giuseppe Longo wrote: > >index 12bffa9..b170add 100644 > >--- a/configure.ac > >+++ b/configure.ac > >@@ -122,8 +122,26 @@ AM_CONDITIONAL([HAVE_LIBNFNETLINK], [test "$nfnetlink" = 1]) > > if test "x$enable_nftables" = "xyes"; then > > PKG_CHECK_MODULES([libmnl], [libmnl >= 1.0], [mnl=1], [mnl=0]) > > > >+ if test "$mnl" = 0; > >+ then > >+ echo "*** Error: No suitable libmnl found. ***" > >+ echo " Please install the 'libmnl' package" > >+ echo " Or consider --disable-nftables to skip" > >+ echo " iptables-compat over nftables support." > >+ exit 1 > >+ fi > > As told you before, I find this unnecessary large. > Consider this instead. > > > From afcbd592265af0c3a65c21e8f23e1c2f5a348396 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 23:18:26 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] build: hard-require libmnl, libnftnl for iptables-nft > > Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxx> > --- > configure.ac | 7 ++++--- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index 12bffa9..e4eafc6 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -120,9 +120,10 @@ PKG_CHECK_MODULES([libnfnetlink], [libnfnetlink >= 1.0], > AM_CONDITIONAL([HAVE_LIBNFNETLINK], [test "$nfnetlink" = 1]) > > if test "x$enable_nftables" = "xyes"; then > - PKG_CHECK_MODULES([libmnl], [libmnl >= 1.0], [mnl=1], [mnl=0]) > - > - PKG_CHECK_MODULES([libnftnl], [libnftnl >= 1.0.5], [nftables=1], [nftables=0]) > + PKG_CHECK_MODULES([libmnl], [libmnl >= 1.0]) > + PKG_CHECK_MODULES([libnftnl], [libnftnl >= 1.0.5]) > + mnl=1 > + nftables=1 This doesn't give a clue to users on what they can actually do. I find Giuseppe's patch more informative. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
