Re: [PATCH 4/4 v5] nftables: rule: Change the field "rule->comment" for an nftnl_udata_buf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21/03/16 23:13, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 09:28:07PM +0100, Carlos Falgueras García wrote:
Now it is possible to store multiple variable length user data into rule.
Modify the parser in order to fill the nftnl_udata with the comment, and
the print function for extract these commentary and print it to user.

Signed-off-by: Carlos Falgueras García <carlosfg@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  include/rule.h            |  7 +++++++
  src/netlink_delinearize.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  src/netlink_linearize.c   | 16 +++++++++++++--
  3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/rule.h b/include/rule.h
index c848f0f..b52f0ac 100644
--- a/include/rule.h
+++ b/include/rule.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
  #include <stdint.h>
  #include <nftables.h>
  #include <list.h>
+#include <libnftnl/udata.h>

  /**
   * struct handle - handle for tables, chains, rules and sets
@@ -396,4 +397,10 @@ extern int do_command(struct netlink_ctx *ctx, struct cmd *cmd);
  extern int cache_update(enum cmd_ops cmd, struct list_head *msgs);
  extern void cache_release(void);

+enum udata_type {
+	UDATA_TYPE_COMMENT,
+	__UDATA_TYPE_MAX,
+};
+#define UDATA_TYPE_MAX (__UDATA_TYPE_MAX - 1)
+
  #endif /* NFTABLES_RULE_H */
diff --git a/src/netlink_delinearize.c b/src/netlink_delinearize.c
index d431588..5fcb5c1 100644
--- a/src/netlink_delinearize.c
+++ b/src/netlink_delinearize.c
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
  #include <utils.h>
  #include <erec.h>
  #include <sys/socket.h>
+#include <libnftnl/udata.h>

  struct netlink_parse_ctx {
  	struct list_head	*msgs;
@@ -1746,6 +1747,54 @@ static void rule_parse_postprocess(struct netlink_parse_ctx *ctx, struct rule *r
  	}
  }

+static int parse_udata_cb(const struct nftnl_udata *attr, void *data)
+{
+	unsigned char *value = nftnl_udata_attr_value(attr);
+	uint8_t type = nftnl_udata_attr_type(attr);
+	uint8_t len = nftnl_udata_attr_len(attr);
+	const struct nftnl_udata **tb = data;
+
+	switch (type) {
+	case UDATA_TYPE_COMMENT:
+		if (value[len - 1] != '\0')
+			return -1;
+		break;
+	default:
+		break;
+	};
+
+	tb[type] = attr;
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static char *udata_get_comment(const void *data, uint32_t data_len)
+{
+	const struct nftnl_udata *tb[UDATA_TYPE_MAX + 1] = {};
+	struct nftnl_udata_buf *udata;
+	uint8_t attr_len;
+	char *comment = NULL;
+
+	udata = nftnl_udata_alloc(data_len);
+	if (!udata)
+		memory_allocation_error();
+	nftnl_udata_copy_data(udata, data, data_len);
+
+	if (nftnl_udata_parse(udata, parse_udata_cb, tb) <= 0)
+		goto exit;

I think this should be instead:

	if (nftnl_udata_parse(data, data_len, parse_udata_cb, tb) <= 0)

So you don't need to allocate the buffer then copy data into it.

I think the buffer infrastructure is only necessary to build the TLV
attributes, not to parse it.


Ok.

+	if (!tb[UDATA_TYPE_COMMENT])
+		goto exit;
+
+	attr_len = nftnl_udata_attr_len(tb[UDATA_TYPE_COMMENT]);
+	comment = xmalloc(attr_len);
+	memcpy(comment, nftnl_udata_attr_value(tb[UDATA_TYPE_COMMENT]),
+	       attr_len);

I'd suggest:

         comment = xstrdup(nftnl_udata_attr_get_str(tb[UDATA_TYPE_COMMENT]));

I'll change this.

+
+exit:
+	nftnl_udata_free(udata);
+	return comment;
+}
+
  struct rule *netlink_delinearize_rule(struct netlink_ctx *ctx,
  				      const struct nftnl_rule *nlr)
  {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux