Thanks Pablo for reviewing
> From: "Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent Time: Saturday, March 12, 2016
> To: "Zhouyi Zhou" <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:03:59AM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> > I think hackers chould build a malicious h323 packet to overflow
(iph->ihl * 4 + th->doff * 4);
> You cannot trust the information that is available in the header. If
> this is bogus this check will be defeated. That's why we pass this
> protoff parameters to each function.
The length of IP header is checked in the function nf_conntrack_in which calls
get_l4proto hook to detect bogus ip header.
There is no where in the call stack to the function set_addr to check bogus
TCP header, and my code does the job:
+ th = (void *)iph + iph->ihl * 4;
+ datalen = skb->len - (iph->ihl * 4 + th->doff * 4);
+ /* check offset overflow */
+ if (addroff > datalen)
+ return -1;
if th->doff be too big addroff will greater than datalen.
>
> You also refer to get_h225_addr() in your description. That function
> always copies 4 or 16 bytes, so I would appreciate if you can describe
> the possible issue further.
The problem of get_h225_addr lies in bogus taddr->ipAddress.ip, if this value
is too big, it may make the pointer p point to no exist address.
(gdb) list 686
681 struct h323_ct_state *ctstate)
682 {
683 const unsigned char *p;
684 int len;
685
686 switch (taddr->choice) {
687 case eTransportAddress_ipAddress:
688 if (nf_ct_l3num(ct) != AF_INET)
689 return 0;
690 p = data + taddr->ipAddress.ip;
Thanks for your time and effort
Cheers
Zhouyi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
