On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 03:40:46PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > Thanks a lot, David!
>
> Cyrill please retest this final patch and let me know if it still works
> properly.
>
> I looked at ipv6, and it's more complicated. The problem is that ipv6
> doesn't mark the inet6dev object as dead in the NETDEV_DOWN case, in
> fact it keeps the object around. It only releases it and marks it
> dead in the NETDEV_UNREGISTER case.
>
> We pay a very large price for having allowed the behavior of ipv6 and
> ipv4 to diverge so greatly in these areas :-(
>
> Nevertheless we should try to fix it somehow, maybe we can detect the
> situation in another way for the ipv6 side.
David, thanks a huge! But you forgot to merge your patch #2
(once I add it manually on top, it works quite well :)
---
net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Index: linux-ml.git/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
===================================================================
--- linux-ml.git.orig/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
+++ linux-ml.git/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c
@@ -922,6 +922,9 @@ void fib_del_ifaddr(struct in_ifaddr *if
subnet = 1;
}
+ if (in_dev->dead)
+ goto no_promotions;
+
/* Deletion is more complicated than add.
* We should take care of not to delete too much :-)
*
@@ -997,6 +1000,7 @@ void fib_del_ifaddr(struct in_ifaddr *if
}
}
+no_promotions:
if (!(ok & BRD_OK))
fib_magic(RTM_DELROUTE, RTN_BROADCAST, ifa->ifa_broadcast, 32, prim);
if (subnet && ifa->ifa_prefixlen < 31) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
