Re: Regarding libxt_multiport translation in nft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 09 March 2016 03:36 PM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> On 9 March 2016 at 08:05, FaTe <gokuvsvegita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello Pablo,
>>
>> I would require some guidance regarding the libxt_multiport translation in nft.
>>
>> If the translation is over ip4 family :
>> $ iptables-translate -A INPUT -p tcp -m multiport --ports 3:4  -j ACCEPT
>> nft add rule ip filter INPUT ip protocol tcp dport { 3-4 } tcp sport { 3-4 } counter accept
>>                              ^^^^^^^^^^^
>>                              this causes problem.
>> Similarly for ipv6 :
>> $ ip6tables-translate -A input -p tcp -m multiport --dports 1024:2048,2049:3333 -j ACCEPT
>> nft add rule ip6 filter input meta l4proto tcp dport { 1024-2048,2049-3333 } counter accept
>>                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>                               this is causing problem.
>>
>> both the strings "ip protocol" and "meta l4proto" is not introduced by libxt_multiport.
>> And in the absence of both , the command works.
>>
>> For example ,
>> $ nft add rule ip filter INPUT tcp dport { 3-4 } tcp sport { 3-4 } counter accept
>>
>> $ nft add rule ip6 filter input tcp dport { 1024-2048,2049-3333 } counter accept
>>
>> Any comment regarding this behaviour ?
> 
> They are different statements, rules should be something like:
>  * meta l4proto tcp tcp dport XX
>  * ip protocol tcp tcp dport XX
> 
> However, the two statements are redundants... the second implies the first.

Thanks Arturo !
It works.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux