Re: [PATCH] configure: Show support for connlabel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:36:33PM +0530, Shivani Bhardwaj wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:30 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 06:56:46PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:05:15PM +0530, Shivani Bhardwaj wrote:
> >> > Yes, I'll do that.
> >> > I need a bit of help here.
> >> > I followed some other modules for which support has been mentioned.
> >> > For example, libipq
> >> > When I first ran the configure script, it turned out
> >> > IPQ support:                          no
> >> >
> >> > I did next time with the option --enable-libipq
> >> > As expected,
> >> > IPQ support:                          yes
> >> >
> >> > But, I tried writing the output of both these cases to files and when
> >> > I looked up for difference between the two, turned out only this IPQ
> >> > support line was different among them, in any case following was shown
> >> >
> >> >  config.status: creating libipq/Makefile
> >> >  config.status: creating libipq/libipq.pc
> >> >
> >> > (because this is a part of AC_CONFIG_FILES)
> >> >
> >> > I do not see any code associated with libipq in configure.ac.
> >> > May be I'm not understanding how these options are working, could you
> >> > please clarify a bit?
> >>
> >> Those are the userspace bits for the old ip_queue support that was
> >> removed years ago, since NFQUEUE superseded for many years.
> >>
> >> commit d16cf20e2f2f13411eece7f7fb72c17d141c4a84
> >> Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date:   Tue May 8 19:45:28 2012 +0200
> >>
> >>     netfilter: remove ip_queue support
> >>
> >> You can still cd iptables/libipq and type 'make' to compile the
> >> this small userspace library since we have to keep new iptables
> >> releases running with old kernels.
> >
> > Oh sorry, now I see.
> >
> > This is always compiling libipq even with --disable-libipq, this looks
> > like a bug in our build infrastructure.
> 
> Yes. Also, I see that devel should have --disable-devel instead of
> --enable-devel option and the appropriate functionality associated
> with it. Please correct me if I am wrong here.

So is --disable-devel also broken / being ignored? If so, that also
needs a fix, yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux