On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 10:57 +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi Ismo,
>
> I like the idea. What I'm wondering is if it worth having another
> directive like 'includedir' to be more explicit.
Sure, I'm fine with that approach too. If the project leadership
indicates that the include directory approach makes sense, I could do a
patch using the 'includedir' syntax too.
Ismo��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�����n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�
