On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 01:37:38PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [ nft meta random ] > > > I'm fine with the probability scaling, but I think we should keep this > > consistent with other selectors, so I would use lt and gte instead > > here. > > > > We can potentially use ranges here too and other available operations > > such as prefixes (although this one I don't know use case for this). > > Ok, so just to clarify. You want me to submit v2 of nft meta random > patch set that turns: > > meta random value > into > meta random lt value > > ... and ... > > meta random ne value > into > meta random ge value > > Is that correct? I think so, so this becomes consistent with other selectors that we have. Does this sound reasonable to you? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
