Re: [PATCH v2] extensions: libxt_mark: Add translation to nft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 07:56:56PM +0530, Shivani Bhardwaj wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > But, anyway after applying you patch I can see:
>> >
>> > # iptables-translate -I INPUT -m mark --mark 10
>> > nft insert rule ip filter INPUT ct mark  & xa counter
>> >
>> > So this kind of work already.
>> >
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just tried adding this rule to nft. It does not work. It only works
>> for integer values of mark. nft shows syntax error for ampersand and
>> hex values.
>>
>> Isn't there something wrong? Please let me know.
>
> The line above should be:
>
> nft insert rule ip filter INPUT ct mark & 0xa counter
>

One more question. Why ct mark when we have no conntrack information
in this module? Shouldn't ct mark be a complete module of conntrack?

> You have to add a simple table and chain configuration to test it:
>
> nft add table filter
> nft add chain filter INPUT { type filter hook input priority 0\; }
>
> The two lines above create a filter table, then it adds an INPUT chain
> to that table.
>
> The correct translation for:
>
> iptables-translate -I INPUT -m mark --mark 10
>
> is:
>
> nft insert rule ip filter INPUT ct mark 0xa counter
>
> Then for:
>
> iptables-translate -I INPUT -m mark --mark 10/10
>
> is:
>
> nft insert rule ip filter INPUT ct mark and 0xa == 0xa counter
>
> You have to take the time to find the right translation too and make
> sure they work.
>
> Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux