Re: [PATCHSET v3] netfilter, cgroup: implement cgroup2 path match in xt_cgroup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tejun,

On 11/21/2015 05:13 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> This is v3 of the xt_cgroup2 patchset.  Changes from the last take are
> 
> * Folded cgroup2 path matching into xt_cgroup as a new revision rather
>   than a separate xt_cgroup2 match as suggested by Pablo.
> 
> * Refreshed on top of Nina's net_cls dynamic config update fix patch.
>   I included the fix patch as part of this series to ease reviewing.

I started to play with your patches and was greeted by this:

[    3.217648] systemd[1]: tmp.mount: Directory /tmp to mount over is not empty, mounting anyway.
[    3.224665] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#1, systemd/1
[    3.225653]  lock: cgroup_sk_update_lock+0x0/0x60, .magic: 00000000, .owner: systemd/1, .owner_cpu: 1
[    3.227034] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 4.4.0-rc1+ #195
[    3.227862] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.2-0-g33fbe13 by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[    3.228906]  ffffffff834a2160 ffff88007c043ad0 ffffffff81551edc ffff88007c028000
[    3.229512]  ffff88007c043af0 ffffffff81136868 ffffffff834a2160 ffff88007aff5940
[    3.230105]  ffff88007c043b08 ffffffff81136b05 ffffffff834a2160 ffff88007c043b20
[    3.230716] Call Trace:
[    3.230906]  [<ffffffff81551edc>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x82
[    3.231289]  [<ffffffff81136868>] spin_dump+0x78/0xc0
[    3.231642]  [<ffffffff81136b05>] do_raw_spin_unlock+0x75/0xd0
[    3.232039]  [<ffffffff81bced77>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x50
[    3.232431]  [<ffffffff819b1848>] update_classid_sock+0x68/0x80
[    3.232836]  [<ffffffff812855c1>] iterate_fd+0x71/0x150
[    3.233197]  [<ffffffff819b1757>] update_classid+0x47/0x80
[    3.233571]  [<ffffffff819b17d4>] cgrp_attach+0x14/0x20
[    3.233929]  [<ffffffff81188951>] cgroup_taskset_migrate+0x1e1/0x330
[    3.234366]  [<ffffffff81188b95>] cgroup_migrate+0xf5/0x190
[    3.234747]  [<ffffffff81188aa5>] ? cgroup_migrate+0x5/0x190
[    3.235130]  [<ffffffff81188da6>] cgroup_attach_task+0x176/0x200
[    3.235543]  [<ffffffff81188c35>] ? cgroup_attach_task+0x5/0x200
[    3.235953]  [<ffffffff8118922d>] __cgroup_procs_write+0x2ad/0x460
[    3.236377]  [<ffffffff81188fde>] ? __cgroup_procs_write+0x5e/0x460
[    3.236805]  [<ffffffff81189414>] cgroup_procs_write+0x14/0x20
[    3.237205]  [<ffffffff81185ae5>] cgroup_file_write+0x35/0x1c0
[    3.237600]  [<ffffffff812e25e1>] kernfs_fop_write+0x141/0x190
[    3.237998]  [<ffffffff81265e78>] __vfs_write+0x28/0xe0
[    3.238361]  [<ffffffff811292c7>] ? percpu_down_read+0x57/0xa0
[    3.238761]  [<ffffffff81268b04>] ? __sb_start_write+0xb4/0xf0
[    3.239154]  [<ffffffff81268b04>] ? __sb_start_write+0xb4/0xf0
[    3.239554]  [<ffffffff812665ec>] vfs_write+0xac/0x1a0
[    3.239930]  [<ffffffff81285fa6>] ? __fget_light+0x66/0x90
[    3.240308]  [<ffffffff81266f09>] SyS_write+0x49/0xb0
[    3.240656]  [<ffffffff81bcfb32>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x76

I am using a Fedora 23 host with systemd.unified_cgroup_hierarchy=1. The config is
available here:

	http://monom.org/cgroup/config-review-xt_cgroup2

Probably completely rubbish, because it's my random test config.

cheers,
daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux