Matt Bennett <Matt.Bennett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Currently we have a number of router features making use of connection > tracking. As such we now require more than the 32 bits connmark > currently has. Our first inclination is to extend this field to 64 bits > and update related areas of code appropriately. > > The major question we have is whether there is a reason this field is 32 > bits (performance reasons or other)? Its meant to align with skb->mark. > If it is not possible to extend this field then perhaps there are other > options (beyond disabling some features making use of connection > tracking)? Have you looked at using conntrack labels? Its a 128bit storage area. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
