Re: nft synproxy integration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09.11, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Am 9. November 2015 19:36:06 GMT+00:00, schrieb Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > >On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > >> The method of using notrack would of course still be possible.
> > >
> > >I like the idea: the notrack method would still be supported and the
> > >"do 
> > >conntrack but with safety-net" way would be possible too. Looks cool!
> > 
> > Thanks Jozsef. I'm thinking it's the best of both worlds myself. Implementation should be quite easy, I'll give it a try.
> 
> I'm fine with the suggestion, but, pardon the heretic question:
> 
> Why do we need synproxy after the recent listen lock removal from Eric?

Simple answer is - its for the network, not for the host :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux