Re: [RFC PATCH nf-next 0/1] payload mangling support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09.11, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > So the main questions is basically, do we want to support stateless NAT?
> > > The downside is that we have to add protocol specific checksumming functions.
> > 
> > For now i'm only be interested in mangling MAC addresses for nft bridge
> > to provide ebtables snat/dnat/redirect equivalents.
> 
> I have not tested that, it probably needs some minor adjustments to skip
> checksum updates for NFT_PAYLOAD_LL_HEADER, but other than that, this will
> obviously work.

For redirect we also need to alter skb->pkttype to PACKET_HOST.

I can take care of this later if needed, I'd just need advice on
how to add this (meta statement?).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux