On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 21:06:33 +0100 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:55:39AM -0700, Ani Sinha wrote: > > netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU race in nf_conntrack_find_get > > Please, no need to Cc everyone here. Please, submit your Netfilter > patches to netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. > > Moreover, it would be great if the subject includes something > descriptive on what you need, for this I'd suggest: > > [PATCH -stable 3.4,backport] netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU race in nf_conntrack_find_get > > I'm including Neal P. Murphy, he said he would help testing these > backports, getting a Tested-by: tag usually speeds up things too. I hammered it a couple nights ago. First test was 5000 processes on 6 SMP CPUs opening and closing a port on a 'remote' host using the usual random source ports. Only got up to 32000 conntracks. The generator was a 64-bit Smoothwall KVM without the patch. The traffic passed through a 32-bit Smoothwall KVM with the patch. The target was on the VM host. No problems encountered. I suspect I didn't come close to triggering the original problem. Second test was a couple thousand processes all using the same source IP and port and dest IP and port. Still no problems. But these were perl scripts (and they used lots of RAM); perhaps a short C program would let me run more. Any ideas on how I might test it more brutally? N -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
