Re: linux 3.4.43 : kernel crash at __nf_conntrack_confirm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ani Sinha <ani@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Coming back to this crash, I see something interesting in the
> conntrack code in linux 3.4.109 (a supported kernel version). I see
> that the hash table manipulations are protected by a spinlock. Also
> lookups/reads are protected by RCU. However allocation and
> deallocation of conntrack objects happen outside of both the locks.
> It seems to me that a conntrack object can be deallocated and a new
> object can be allocated and initialized within the same RCU grace
> period, while the hash table is being read.

Yes.  We need to use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU instead of kfree_rcu because
there could be hundreds of thousands of alloc/free pairs within a short
time period.

> It looks like a bug to me.

No, as long as readers detect object reuse.

> > Looking upstream, I see a couple of patches which fixes race condition
> > around the use of the conntrack hash table with RCU (lock free read)
> > primitives :
> >
> > commit c6825c0976fa7893692e0e43b09740b419b23c09
> > Author: Andrey Vagin <avagin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Wed Jan 29 19:34:14 2014 +0100
> >      netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix RCU race in nf_conntrack_find_get
> >
> > and a followup patch :
> >
> > commit e53376bef2cd97d3e3f61fdc677fb8da7d03d0da
> > Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Mon Feb 3 20:01:53 2014 +0100
> >         netfilter: nf_conntrack: don't release a conntrack with non-zero refcnt
> >

These for instance fix such bugs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux