[PATCH -next 1/8] netfilter: ingress: don't use nf_hook_list_active

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



nf_hook_list_active() always returns true once at least one device has
NF_INGRESS hook enabled.

Thus, don't use this function. Instead, inverse the test and use the static
key to elide list_empty test if no NF_INGRESS hooks are active.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/netfilter_ingress.h | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter_ingress.h b/include/linux/netfilter_ingress.h
index 187feab..ba7ce88 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfilter_ingress.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfilter_ingress.h
@@ -5,10 +5,13 @@
 #include <linux/netdevice.h>
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS
-static inline int nf_hook_ingress_active(struct sk_buff *skb)
+static inline bool nf_hook_ingress_active(const struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
-	return nf_hook_list_active(&skb->dev->nf_hooks_ingress,
-				   NFPROTO_NETDEV, NF_NETDEV_INGRESS);
+#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
+	if (!static_key_false(&nf_hooks_needed[NFPROTO_NETDEV][NF_NETDEV_INGRESS]))
+		return false;
+#endif
+	return !list_empty(&skb->dev->nf_hooks_ingress);
 }
 
 static inline int nf_hook_ingress(struct sk_buff *skb)
-- 
2.0.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux