On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:53:30PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 01:01:39PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> Instead store ipvs in extra2 so that proc_do_defense_mode can easily > >> find the ipvs that it's value is associated with. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I am wondering if this fix should be included in v4.3 and stable. > > Can the problem occur in practice? > > I believe a lookup in one network namespace followed by write in another > network namespace would do it. So I think it would take so pretty > deliberate and more or less peculiar actions to make it happen. > > I don't know how important the update_defense_level call is or how bad > it is if it does not run in a network namespace . Thanks, my feeling is that this problem can be fixed via next. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
