From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 01:26:07 +0200
> Fengguang reported, that some randconfig generated the following linker
> issue with nf_ct_zone_dflt object involved:
>
> [...]
> CC init/version.o
> LD init/built-in.o
> net/built-in.o: In function `ipv4_conntrack_defrag':
> nf_defrag_ipv4.c:(.text+0x93e95): undefined reference to `nf_ct_zone_dflt'
> net/built-in.o: In function `ipv6_defrag':
> nf_defrag_ipv6_hooks.c:(.text+0xe3ffe): undefined reference to `nf_ct_zone_dflt'
> make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
>
> Given that configurations exist where we have a built-in part, which is
> accessing nf_ct_zone_dflt such as the two handlers nf_ct_defrag_user()
> and nf_ct6_defrag_user(), and a part that configures nf_conntrack as a
> module, we must move nf_ct_zone_dflt into a fixed, guaranteed built-in
> area when netfilter is configured in general.
>
> Therefore, split the more generic parts into a common header under
> include/linux/netfilter/ and move nf_ct_zone_dflt into the built-in
> section that already holds parts related to CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK in the
> netfilter core. This fixes the issue on my side.
>
> Fixes: 308ac9143ee2 ("netfilter: nf_conntrack: push zone object into functions")
> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> [ Here's the 2nd one for either nf-next or net-next. I've tried various
> Kconfig combinations including the one Fengguang reported, seems to be
> okay from my side. ]
Ok I'll apply this directly too, thanks Daniel.
If Pablo and others want to fix this another way, they can send me
a relative patch.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
