From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Replace an overcomplicated switch statement with a simple if statement. This also removes the ingress queue enable outside of nf_hook_mutex as the protection provided by the mutex is not necessary and the code is clearer having both of the static key increments together. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/netfilter/core.c | 17 ++++++----------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c index a0e5497..c4c3b85 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/core.c +++ b/net/netfilter/core.c @@ -74,7 +74,6 @@ int nf_register_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg) if (reg->hooknum == NF_NETDEV_INGRESS) { BUG_ON(reg->dev == NULL); nf_hook_list = ®->dev->nf_hooks_ingress; - net_inc_ingress_queue(); break; } #endif @@ -90,6 +89,10 @@ int nf_register_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg) } list_add_rcu(®->list, elem->list.prev); mutex_unlock(&nf_hook_mutex); +#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS + if (reg->pf == NFPROTO_NETDEV && reg->hooknum == NF_NETDEV_INGRESS) + net_inc_ingress_queue(); +#endif #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL static_key_slow_inc(&nf_hooks_needed[reg->pf][reg->hooknum]); #endif @@ -102,18 +105,10 @@ void nf_unregister_hook(struct nf_hook_ops *reg) mutex_lock(&nf_hook_mutex); list_del_rcu(®->list); mutex_unlock(&nf_hook_mutex); - switch (reg->pf) { - case NFPROTO_NETDEV: #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS - if (reg->hooknum == NF_NETDEV_INGRESS) { - net_dec_ingress_queue(); - break; - } - break; + if (reg->pf == NFPROTO_NETDEV && reg->hooknum == NF_NETDEV_INGRESS) + net_dec_ingress_queue(); #endif - default: - break; - } #ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL static_key_slow_dec(&nf_hooks_needed[reg->pf][reg->hooknum]); #endif -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html