On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 06:41:54PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Wednesday 2015-07-15 18:24, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > >On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 02:53:39PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > >[...] > >> diff --git a/extensions/libxt_esp.t b/extensions/libxt_esp.t > >> index 008013b..f207def 100644 > >> --- a/extensions/libxt_esp.t > >> +++ b/extensions/libxt_esp.t > >> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > >> -p esp -m esp --espspi 0:4294967295;-p esp -m esp;OK > >> -p esp -m esp ! --espspi 0:4294967294;=;OK > >> -p esp -m esp --espspi -1;;FAIL > >> +-p esp -m esp;-p esp -m esp --espspi 0;FAIL > >> # should fail? > >> -p esp -m esp;=;OK > > > >This line looks very similar to the one above the comment, but it says OK. > > Indeed the FAIL line is indeed mirroring the OK line, the latter of > which should have failed the testsuite previously. Right. Given that this is changing the behaviour again, I would suggest that -p esp -m esp displays -p -m esp --espspi 0:4294967295 via iptables-save. I think this default behaviour is less obscure which they can still type less from the command line. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
