[PATCH -next 0/4] netfilter: xtables: improve jumpstack handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



During NFWS 2015 Eric Dumazet suggested various ideas to make
the xtables table traversers function setup less expensive.

In particular, the *_do_table functions keep track of the current
stack pointer.

It appears that we can simplify this to always start from 0
(therefore allowing us to avoid the save/restore) provided we make sure
that we use an alternate jump stack when we enter the traverser recursively
via TEE target.

This implements a few of Erics suggestions.

NOTE1: The last patch is only RFC material, see the patch description.

Its the clasic question wheter we're willing to reject bizarre ruleset
or not.  If this patch is acceptable, we can avoid one more dereference
by using percpu allocation for the jumpstack.

Florian Westphal (4):
      xtables: compute exact size needed for jumpstack
      netfilter: move tee_active to core
      netfilter: xtables: don't save/restore jumpstack offset
      netfilter: xtables: add upper limit on call chain depth

 include/linux/netfilter.h          |   11 ++++++
 include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h |    1 
 net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c    |   31 +++++++++--------
 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c     |   65 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c    |   49 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 net/netfilter/core.c               |    3 +
 net/netfilter/x_tables.c           |   30 ++++++++++-------
 net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c             |   13 +++----
 8 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux