Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 01:41:49PM +0200, Felix Janda wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > include/libnetfilter_log/linux_nfnetlink_log.h | 42 +++++++++++++------------- > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/libnetfilter_log/linux_nfnetlink_log.h b/include/libnetfilter_log/linux_nfnetlink_log.h > > index 9f38277..c647581 100644 > > --- a/include/libnetfilter_log/linux_nfnetlink_log.h > > +++ b/include/libnetfilter_log/linux_nfnetlink_log.h > > @@ -20,31 +20,31 @@ enum nfulnl_msg_types { > > }; > > > > struct nfulnl_msg_packet_hdr { > > - __be16 hw_protocol; /* hw protocol (network order) */ > > - __u8 hook; /* netfilter hook */ > > - __u8 _pad; > > + uint16_t hw_protocol; /* hw protocol (network order) */ > > + uint8_t hook; /* netfilter hook */ > > + uint8_t _pad; > > }; > > I have skipped this patch in this series. It is mangling a cached > header from the kernel, I guess there must be a way to make musl happy > without this change given that we follow the same approach in other > libraries. > > Thanks. Yes, the conversion of types is not strictly necessary. As long as <linux/types.h> is included, everything is fine for musl. I have likely misunderstood your previous mail. Feel free to ignore patches mangling kernel headers after updating them. Thanks for your review and pushing of patches so far! Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html