Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: conntrack: warn the user if there is a better helper to use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 02:24:14PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:57:12AM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > After db29a9508a92 ("netfilter: conntrack: disable generic tracking for
> > known protocols"), if the specific helper is built but not loaded
> > (a standard for most distributions) systems with a restrictive firewall
> > but weak configuration regarding netfilter modules to load, will
> > silently stop working.
> > 
> > This patch then puts a warning message so the sysadmin knows where to
> > start looking into. It's a pr_warn_once regardless of protocol itself
> > but it should be enough to give a hint on where to look.
> 
> Applied to nf-next.
> 
> I'd rather see some evaluation on getting these helpers into the
> nf_conntrack module in terms of extra size, just as we do for tcp, udp
> and icmp. Moreover, these trackers (specifically DCCP and SCTP) got
> not much care so some extra review would be good if we decide to get
> this into core.

That would be much better yes.

> I'm telling this because assuming that people will look at this warn
> once still seem weak assumption to me.
> 
> Thanks for your patience.

Ok, thanks Pablo.

  Marcelo

> > Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_generic.c | 8 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_generic.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_generic.c
> > index 60865f1103099383c4263a1a56e691b3c86c3720..2281be419a74b6d8abe0fd7da8d7e8b35d304600 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_generic.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_generic.c
> > @@ -90,7 +90,13 @@ static int generic_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
> >  static bool generic_new(struct nf_conn *ct, const struct sk_buff *skb,
> >  			unsigned int dataoff, unsigned int *timeouts)
> >  {
> > -	return nf_generic_should_process(nf_ct_protonum(ct));
> > +	bool ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = nf_generic_should_process(nf_ct_protonum(ct));
> > +	if (!ret)
> > +		pr_warn_once("conntrack: generic helper won't handle protocol %d. Please consider loading the specific helper module.\n",
> > +			     nf_ct_protonum(ct));
> > +	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK_TIMEOUT)
> > -- 
> > 2.4.1
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux