Re: netlink multi-thread / libmnl / nfq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes with --queue-balance do I open a socket via nfq_open() per thread
or do I just have the one nfq_open() and have each thread call
nfq_create_queue only?

On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ryan Johnston <ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> When creating a multi-threaded NFQ/Netlink application, should I have
>> multiple threads with fd sockets connected to the kernel, or do I have
>> one socket with multiple thread loops to read the socket?
>
> Its up to you.
>
>> If I am to have many threaded fd sockets connected to kernel's
>> netlink, is there any performance loss by having too many?
>
> For best performance use multiple queues, e.g. manually via iptables
> -m cpu ...  -j NFQUEUE, or via iptables .. NFQUEUE --queue-balance 0:x,
> then run one process or thread for each queue.
>
> One thread per queue model is implemented in suricata ids for example.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux