Re: [PATCH] Optimise nfq_queue_cb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pablo,

On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:22:00AM +0100, Paul Aitken wrote:
ct and myct have both already been checked for non-NULL,
so there's no need to check either of them again later.

Signed-off-by: Paul Aitken <paitken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  src/cthelper.c | 8 +++-----
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/cthelper.c b/src/cthelper.c
index 15d5126..6537515 100644
--- a/src/cthelper.c
+++ b/src/cthelper.c
@@ -325,14 +325,12 @@ static int nfq_queue_cb(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *data)
  	if (pkt_verdict_issue(helper, myct, queue_num, id, verdict, pktb) < 0)
  		goto err_pktb;
-	if (ct != NULL)
-		nfct_destroy(ct);
+	nfct_destroy(ct);
void nfct_destroy(struct nf_conntrack *ct)
{
         assert(ct != NULL);
         ...

the library doesn't allow NULL pointers.

ct was already checked for non-NULL when it was assigned around line 297:

        ct = nfct_new();
        if (ct == NULL)
                goto err;

- so ct cannot be NULL at line 325.


P.

  	if (myct->exp != NULL)
  		nfexp_destroy(myct->exp);
-	if (myct && myct->priv_data != NULL)
+	if (myct->priv_data != NULL)
  		free(myct->priv_data);
-	if (myct != NULL)
-		free(myct);
+	free(myct);
  	return MNL_CB_OK;
  err_pktb:
--
1.9.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux