On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:59:46AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 5/13/15 9:19 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >This patch adds the Netfilter ingress hook just after the existing tc ingress
> >hook, that seems to be the consensus solution for this.
>
> Looks good to me.
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> >diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> >index 2b39235..6c256f8 100644
> >--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> >+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> >@@ -1659,6 +1659,9 @@ struct net_device {
> > struct tcf_proto __rcu *ingress_cl_list;
> > #endif
> > struct netdev_queue __rcu *ingress_queue;
> >+#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS
> >+ struct list_head nf_hooks_ingress;
> >+#endif
> ...
> >diff --git a/net/netfilter/Kconfig b/net/netfilter/Kconfig
> >index f70e34a..db1c674 100644
> >--- a/net/netfilter/Kconfig
> >+++ b/net/netfilter/Kconfig
> >@@ -1,6 +1,13 @@
> > menu "Core Netfilter Configuration"
> > depends on NET && INET && NETFILTER
> >
> >+config NETFILTER_INGRESS
> >+ bool "Netfilter ingress support"
> >+ select NET_INGRESS
> >+ help
> >+ This allows you to classify packets from ingress using the Netfilter
> >+ infrastructure.
> >+
>
> should be some default hint as well?
> not sure why you want to do it under another config flag.
> Just makes it harder to test all config combinations.
> I think under global CONFIG_NETFILTER it would be fine as well.
Yes, that default can be added there. And I agree, since this depends
on CONFIG_NETFILTER should be fine. I have more patches following up,
I can queue one small for this.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
