On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 11:20:26PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > >>In order to fix it, you also need to add: > >> > >> From 1d0ab253872cdd3d8e7913f59c266c7fd01771d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >>From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 21:12:12 -0700 > >>Subject: [PATCH] net: add sk_fullsock() helper > >> > >>which in turn needs this one: > >> > >> From 10feb428a5045d5eb18a5d755fbb8f0cc9645626 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >>From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:44:04 -0700 > >>Subject: [PATCH] inet: add TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV state > > > >I've just dropped the patch, thanks for letting me know, odd that my > >build tests missed it. > > If you're nevertheless interested in this fix, you could use this version, > which should apply/build just fine: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/455546/ > > I believe Pablo usually sends netfilter patches in bundles to you. Yes, I keep an internal queue netfilter patches that I consider important to go to -stable. I think it's better if anyone willing to get some netfilter related patch into -stable just point that to me so I take care of it. At least that should add one extra filter step to make sure things don't break in this process. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
