Re: [PATCH 0/7 RFC] Netfilter/nf_tables ingress support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/13/15 at 09:19pm, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Now the advantages of being able to use nft. First, the obvious
> one is that we have a nice userspace tool, a well defined
> grammar, and that people would be able to use the same tool for
> very similar tasks. nftables in the kernel is almost completely
> lockless, we support way more possibilites already and we won't
> have to add new special case TC actions anymore. Look at the
> connmark action for example. It can set a value. How long until
> someone wants to use a bitmask? We support all operations
> (assignment, bit operations) for all types, we have sets for fast
> lookups, maps for associating values quickly, we have a nice and
> readable syntax and full translation back to the readable
> representation and much more.

*cough* Performance numbers? *cough* ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux