On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:45:05AM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote: [...]: > I want this decision to be made based on what users actually need and > on what they need it for. Not basically pull in everything from iptables > in one go without even thinking about it. > > As a middle ground, I think I could agree to adding the xt compat > framework, but only allow selective extensions to be used where we > are sure we need them. The framework fully supports this, imposing an artificial limitation makes no sense to me at all. And more importantly, without this patch nft breaks when users load their ruleset throught iptables-compat-restore. With that artificial limitation, some rulesets will break, some other not. Admit it, there is no way we can control what users will do in the future. The only way out is to move forward in an evolutionary fashion. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
