Re: Re: [PATCH] Add NFPROTO_ARP for mark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 03:54:33AM +0000, Zhang, Chunyu wrote:
> >From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
> >Date: 2015-04-09
> >To: Zhang, Chunyu/章 春宇
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add NFPROTO_ARP for mark
[...]
> >> @@ -41,13 +42,23 @@ mark_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct xt_action_param *par)
> >>       return ((skb->mark & info->mask) == info->mark) ^ info->invert;
> >>  }
> >> 
> >> -static struct xt_target mark_tg_reg __read_mostly = {
> >> -     .name           = "MARK",
> >> -     .revision       = 2,
> >> -     .family         = NFPROTO_UNSPEC,
> >> -     .target         = mark_tg,
> >> -     .targetsize     = sizeof(struct xt_mark_tginfo2),
> >> -     .me             = THIS_MODULE,
> >> +static struct xt_target mark_tg_reg[] __read_mostly = {
> >> +     {
> >> +             .name           = "MARK",
> >> +             .revision       = 2,
> >> +             .family         = NFPROTO_UNSPEC,
> >> +             .target         = mark_tg,
> >> +             .targetsize     = sizeof(struct xt_mark_tginfo2),
> >> +             .me             = THIS_MODULE,
> >> +     },
> >> +     {
> >> +             .name           = "MARK",
> >> +             .revision       = 2,
> >> +             .family         = NFPROTO_ARP,
> >> +             .target         = mark_tg,
> >> +             .targetsize     = sizeof(struct xt_mark_tginfo2),
> >> +             .me             = THIS_MODULE,
> >> +     }
> >>  };
> >
> >You don't need this.
> >
> >The problem is here that your patch:
> >
> >http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/455966/
> >
> >is missing this chunk:
> >
> >diff --git a/libarptc/libarptc_incl.c b/libarptc/libarptc_incl.c
> >index a034930..87404ce 100644
> >--- a/libarptc/libarptc_incl.c
> >+++ b/libarptc/libarptc_incl.c
> >@@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ map_target(const TC_HANDLE_T handle,
> >        /* memset to all 0 for your memcmp convenience. */
> >        memset(t->u.user.name + strlen(t->u.user.name),
> >               0,
> >-              FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN - strlen(t->u.user.name));
> >+              FUNCTION_MAXNAMELEN - 1 - strlen(t->u.user.name));
> >        return 1;
> > }
> >
> >Otherwise, the revision number is zeroed.
> >
> >And you don't need: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/455965/.
> >
> >Please, rebase your userspace patches on top of current arptables git
> >and resubmit. Thanks.
>
> get it 。will do。
> why arptables --set-mark can work , when add  NFPROTO_ARP to xt_mark ?

I guess you're still using the userspace patches you sent.

If you rebase on top of current arptables HEAD, that will not work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux