Re: [PATCH nf-next 2/2] netfilter: x_tables: fix cgroup's NF_INET_LOCAL_IN sk lookups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/25/2015 09:26 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:30:29PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
While originally only being intended for outgoing traffic, commit
a00e76349f35 ("netfilter: x_tables: allow to use cgroup match for
LOCAL_IN nf hooks") enabled xt_cgroups for the NF_INET_LOCAL_IN hook
as well, in order to allow for nfacct accounting.

This basically was under the assumption that socket early demux will
resolve it. It's correct that demux happens after PRE_ROUTING, but
before LOCAL_IN.

However, that as-is only partially works, i.e. it works for the case
of established TCP and connected UDP sockets when early demux is
enabled, but not for various other ingress scenarios e.g. unconnected
UDP, request sockets, etc.

Instead of reverting commit a00e76349f35, I think it's worth to fix
it up as there are applications requiring xt_cgroup to match on
ingress and egress side. In order to do so, we need to perform a
full lookup on skb->sk (ingress) miss, similarly as being done in
xt_socket.

Therefore, we need to make use of shared helpers xt_sk_lookup() and
xt_sk_lookup6(). Thanks to Daniel for the report and also additional
testing.

So this is basically needed when early demux is disabled?

This is a rather large rework, I would like to know what scenarios
we're not currently catching with the existing code.

Hm, perhaps Daniel can elaborate better, what I have seen in my
testing when xt_cgroup fails to match the cgroup on ingress traffic
is i) early demux sysctl disabled, ii) udp on unconnected sockets
(which I understand is the majority of udp traffic), iii) tcp and
udp (any kind) on localhost communications. Daniel's original report
can be found here [1].

Thanks,
Daniel

  [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/355527
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux