On 25.03, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 03/25/15 at 11:30am, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > I'm getting really annoyed that people keep sending patches touching
> > this stuff without CCing either netfilter-devel or me personally.
> >
> > This is just causing unnecessary work. The code in nft_hash is going
> > to get replaced anyways, so now I can rebase 30 patches for no gain
> > at all.
> >
> > If you touch netfilter, CC the relevant lists and people please.
> > Thanks!
>
> Sorry about that Patrick. Not copying you on the nft_hash change
> was a mistake. I apologize. I was only aware of your following
> patchset which seemed compatible with my changes.
Its usually not a big deal if you forget, but it has happened
too many times recently with rhashtable, so I was getting a little
upset. Anyways, apology accepted :)
> "[PATCH 0/2] netfilter: preparatory patches for set extensions"
>
> If your larger patchset resolves the RCU lockdep splash in nft_hash
> then we can also just revert 6b6f302ce ("rhashtable: Add
> rhashtable_free_and_destroy()") or I can rebase it on top of your
> series.
I'd like to prevent further delays, so I've already started merging
everything on top of that change. Thanks anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
