Re: [PATCH nf-next 0/8] netfilter: untangle bridge and bridge netfilter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 02:01:10PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> We can store ifindexes of physin/physout and re-lookup, sure.
> 
> I'll start on the central storage infrastructure.
> Do you want me to base it on the current patches i have or on plain
> nf-next?

Let me pick these first:

[-next,v2] netfilter: bridge: query conntrack about skb dnat
[-next,resend] netfilter: bridge: remove BRNF_STATE_BRIDGED flag

This, I'll ping David to ack it:

[v2,nf-next,1/6] net: untangle ip_fragment and bridge netfilter

The follow up patches, you please rebase upon the central storage
idea. I like your small state machine idea instead of playing with
flags and the new functions that encapsulate the save/restore mangling
to keep IP/bridge happy.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux