Re: [PATCH] netfilter: don't output error message redundantly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 24. Juli 2014 13:49:46 MESZ, schrieb Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 02:19:09PM +0800, Duan Jiong wrote:
>> 
>> The function led_trigger_register() will only return -EEXIST when
>> error arises.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  net/netfilter/xt_LED.c | 4 +---
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_LED.c b/net/netfilter/xt_LED.c
>> index 993de2b..b47a58c 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/xt_LED.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/xt_LED.c
>> @@ -133,9 +133,7 @@ static int led_tg_check(const struct
>xt_tgchk_param *par)
>>  
>>  	err = led_trigger_register(&ledinternal->netfilter_led_trigger);
>>  	if (err) {
>> -		pr_warning("led_trigger_register() failed\n");
>> -		if (err == -EEXIST)
>> -			pr_warning("Trigger name is already in use.\n");
>> +		pr_warning("Trigger name is already in use.\n");
>
>This should be pr_err() since the rule fails to be loaded if
>led_trigger_register() fails.

I disagree with this patch, any error and EEXIST are two different things.

>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>netfilter-devel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux