Re: [PATCH -next v3] netfilter: reject: don't send icmp error if csum is invalid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 06:54:04PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c
> > index d05b364..68e0bb4 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.c
> > @@ -208,4 +208,39 @@ void nf_send_reset6(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *oldskb, int hook)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_send_reset6);
> >  
> > +static bool reject6_csum_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, int hook)
> > +{
> > +	const struct ipv6hdr *ip6h = ipv6_hdr(skb);
> > +	int thoff;
> > +	__be16 fo;
> > +	u8 proto;
> > +
> > +	if (skb->csum_bad)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	if (skb_csum_unnecessary(skb))
> > +		return true;
> > +
> > +	proto = ip6h->nexthdr;
> > +	thoff = ipv6_skip_exthdr(skb, ((u8*)(ip6h+1) - skb->data), &proto, &fo);
> > +
> > +	if (thoff < 0 || thoff >= skb->len || (fo & htons(~0x7)) != 0)
> > +		return false;
> 
> I think you can use thoff and fragoff from struct xt_action_param, so
> we can save some cycles here.

No, I don't think so.  Seems its onl set for rules that use "-p" option,
see f.e.

net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c which fill this only in case we have

        /* look for the desired protocol header */
        if((ip6info->flags & IP6T_F_PROTO)) {

in ip6_packet_match().

> I can take over these patches and make this changes if you like, let
> me know. Thanks.

I have no objections if you can find a way to avoid ipv6_skip_exthdr() call.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux