Re: [libnftnl PATCH v2] ruleset: fix a leak when we use the set lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:12:22PM +0100, Alvaro Neira Ayuso wrote:
> ==18632== 285 (16 direct, 269 indirect) bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in
> loss record 6 of 6
> ==18632==    at 0x4C272B8: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:566)
> ==18632==    by 0x5043822: nft_set_list_alloc (set.c:977)
> ==18632==    by 0x5045483: nft_ruleset_json_parse (ruleset.c:442)
> ==18632==    by 0x50458BE: nft_ruleset_do_parse (ruleset.c:696)
> ==18632==    by 0x408AEC: do_command (rule.c:1317)
> ==18632==    by 0x406B05: nft_run (main.c:194)
> ==18632==    by 0x40667C: main (main.c:360)

Also applied. I found more leaks, just pushed a patch to fix them
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux