Re: [PATCH 2/9] nftables: reject NFT_SET_ELEM_INTERVAL_END flag for non-interval sets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Patrick,

Unless you have any concern, I'm going to apply this and 8/9 to
nf-next, so you don't need to resend these two sanitization fixes.

Thanks.

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 07:46:27AM +0000, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> index 129a8da..92ba4a0 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> @@ -3112,6 +3112,9 @@ static int nft_add_set_elem(struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
>  		elem.flags = ntohl(nla_get_be32(nla[NFTA_SET_ELEM_FLAGS]));
>  		if (elem.flags & ~NFT_SET_ELEM_INTERVAL_END)
>  			return -EINVAL;
> +		if (!(set->flags & NFT_SET_INTERVAL) &&
> +		    elem.flags & NFT_SET_ELEM_INTERVAL_END)
> +			return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (set->flags & NFT_SET_MAP) {
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux