On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 05:45:59PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote: > Translate ebtables verdict to the ones used by the nf_tables engine, > so we can properly use ebtables target extensions from nft_compat. > > Signed-off-by: Arturo Borrero Gonzalez <arturo.borrero.glez@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > net/netfilter/nft_compat.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c > index 7f90d06..8ac7238 100644 > --- a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c > +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c > @@ -52,9 +52,8 @@ nft_compat_set_par(struct xt_action_param *par, void *xt, const void *xt_info) > par->hotdrop = false; > } > > -static void nft_target_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr, > - struct nft_data data[NFT_REG_MAX + 1], > - const struct nft_pktinfo *pkt) > +static int nft_target_eval_call(const struct nft_expr *expr, > + const struct nft_pktinfo *pkt) Not sure it's worth the factorization, this code is rather small. I'd suggest you just add nft_target_eval_bridge() as a copy of the original _eval function. Rename the original nft_target_eval() to nft_target_eval_xt(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
