Re: [PATCH 7/9] rhashtable: Per bucket locks & deferred expansion/shrinking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16.01, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 01/16/15 at 04:32pm, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > If we have to block, the dumper if of course preferred. Taking the
> > mutex should do fine I guess?
> 
> That will work, it will also ensure that the walker doesn't see the
> pre unzip state which would cause entries to be duplicated in the
> walker.
> 
> > I suppose walking both tables without any races would be rather
> > complicated.
> 
> Very interested if you can come up with something ;-)

For now I'll stick to the mutex. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux